Avoid Windows Vista anti-piracy shenanigans by using BSD, OpenSolaris or Linux.

Today I was reading about the “Reduced Functionality” capability of Windows Vista. According to that article, Microsoft has now enabled this capability, which renders a “nongenuine” copy of Windows essentially unusable.

Frankly, I just can’t see why anybody would want to use Windows Vista. I’m sure the questionable nature of this sort of functionality is quite obvious to most. And it’s also pretty obvious how the misidentification of an installation as being “nongenuine” could be quite disasterous. A completely legitimate installation of Vista locking up accidentally because of such functionality could cost an individual or business a great deal of time and money.

Beyond that, we have readily-available, high-quality alternative operating systems that don’t bother with such nonsense. These days, Ubuntu provides a very usable desktop or workstation OS. There are other Linux distributions that are more suited for server-oriented tasks. FreeBSD is another alternative for desktop/workstation and server usage. Of course, there are also NetBSD, OpenBSD, and DragonFly BSD. And we can’t forget OpenSolaris.

Using such systems is just the safest thing to do. First of all, you get access to virtually all of the software used on such a system. Even if you have no interest in modifying or redistributing it, having the code available allows for inspection, should that be necessary.

The redistribution of such software is usually allowed, and often encouraged. With ISO images typically available for (free) download from the distribution or project itself, one has to worry little about accidentally obtaining pirated software.

And in terms of functionality, the essentials are all there. For many people, the transition would be quite easy. Those who use software like Firefox and OpenOffice.org on Windows could immediately use those same products on Linux, BSD or OpenSolaris.

The hardware support Linux offers today is excellent. For the past few years, I’ve encountered far more hardware supported out-of-the-box by Linux than I have with the Windows installations I have performed. The need for installing a separate driver is often nil.

So when it comes down to it, it really just doesn’t make much sense why any person or organization would subject themselves to Windows Vista. The benefits just aren’t there, and the dangers appear to be many. And what’s more, there are free alternatives out there that can perform the same tasks just as well, if not better. It’s really a no-brainer: Linux, OpenSolaris and/or BSD is the way to go!

4 Responses to “Avoid Windows Vista anti-piracy shenanigans by using BSD, OpenSolaris or Linux.”

  1. Andrew Says:

    I just installed PCLinuxOS 2007 today. It does everything Vista does except totally free. It flies on a 2GHz Athlon with 512MB and a Geforce6200 - all quite low end hardware - with Beryl display goodies too.

  2. NameInvalid Says:

    Thanks for the info about Linux. I have a legal copy of XP Pro (free “upgrade” from Home by Microsoft Canada, after complaining about using up my online activation quota), and I find it’s still good, as long as it isn’t taken online. I use Window$ when I need to, and I happily use Linux all other times. Linux isn’t perfect, but Micro$haft has reason for worry. I’d encourage anyone with any technical interest to try Linux, particularly Ubuntu which “just worked” even with my wireless card. FreeBSD is also good, stable, and fast; OpenBSD is even more conservative and secure but more of a hassle to install. Micro$hite treats its customers like criminals, and the so-called (legally-unenforcable) EULA totally sucks, let alone the fact that the operating system rats you out to the company server at regular intervals. Half of the Winblow$ code seems to be an unholy mix of stuff that allows the various and different parts of the OS to communicate with each other, instead of allowing you to do your work/play with ease. Open-source rocks!

  3. What is Ubuntu? Says:

    I don’t think that there is much of a choice. I cannot imagine anyone updating an old computer to Vista, as hardware older than about one year cannot even run Vista. The only OS upgrade that can be done with old hardware is Ubuntu or another linux distro.

  4. Steven Freeman Says:

    Or of course you could you could get a legit copy of Vista. Is it me or are you simply not willing to look at the real solution?

Leave a Reply

*
To protect against spam, please type the word in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word