<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NQP highlights a serious problem with Parrot.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pinderkent.blogsavy.com/archives/131/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pinderkent.blogsavy.com/archives/131</link>
	<description>Just another Blogsavy.com weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Sherman</title>
		<link>http://pinderkent.blogsavy.com/archives/131#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Sherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinderkent.blogsavy.com/archives/144#comment-258</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree with your assessment. No one's code stopped working when NQP came out. It's a new layer that modularizes and abstracts the previously low-level (TGE) way of transforming ASTs. Many examples in the languages directory of the Parrot source tree don't actually use NQP because they pre-date it, and that's fine.

Your comment makes me think of someone seeing the first release of libwww-perl and saying, "this demonstrates that Perl is not a stable programming language."

If Parrot comes out with a debugger, will that also demonstrate that it isn't stable? What about an internationalization toolkit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree with your assessment. No one&#8217;s code stopped working when NQP came out. It&#8217;s a new layer that modularizes and abstracts the previously low-level (TGE) way of transforming ASTs. Many examples in the languages directory of the Parrot source tree don&#8217;t actually use NQP because they pre-date it, and that&#8217;s fine.</p>
<p>Your comment makes me think of someone seeing the first release of libwww-perl and saying, &#8220;this demonstrates that Perl is not a stable programming language.&#8221;</p>
<p>If Parrot comes out with a debugger, will that also demonstrate that it isn&#8217;t stable? What about an internationalization toolkit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mj</title>
		<link>http://pinderkent.blogsavy.com/archives/131#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>mj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 09:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinderkent.blogsavy.com/archives/144#comment-257</guid>
		<description>Parrot and this article related links:
* www.ohloh.net/projects/4406?p=Parrot
* www.perlfoundation.org/parrot_grant_from_nlnet
* www.oreillynet.com/onlamp/blog/2007/08/constraints_and_software_devel.html
* perl6.cz/wiki/Perl_6_and_Parrot_links</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Parrot and this article related links:<br />
* <a href="http://www.ohloh.net/projects/4406?p=Parrot" rel="nofollow">http://www.ohloh.net/projects/4406?p=Parrot</a><br />
* <a href="http://www.perlfoundation.org/parrot_grant_from_nlnet" rel="nofollow">http://www.perlfoundation.org/parrot_grant_from_nlnet</a><br />
* <a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/onlamp/blog/2007/08/constraints_and_software_devel.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.oreillynet.com/onlamp/blog/2007/08/constraints_and_software_devel.html</a><br />
* perl6.cz/wiki/Perl_6_and_Parrot_links</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
