<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A good package management system reduces the need for &#8220;System Restore&#8221; functionality?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pinderkent.blogsavy.com/archives/29/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pinderkent.blogsavy.com/archives/29</link>
	<description>Just another Blogsavy.com weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 01:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Planeta FreeBSD &#187; A good package management system reduces the need for “System Restore” functionality?</title>
		<link>http://pinderkent.blogsavy.com/archives/29#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Planeta FreeBSD &#187; A good package management system reduces the need for “System Restore” functionality?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 05:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinderkent.blogsavy.com/archives/29#comment-42</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by Pain and Glory from the Trenches of the IT World [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Original post by Pain and Glory from the Trenches of the IT World [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
