If more and more software developers are going to be developing browser-based applications using technologies such as JavaScript, Flash, and AJAX, we will need to see the Web browser become a much more capable platform. In short, the browser will need to duplicate much of the work that has been done over the years in the operating systems field.
One computing myth we hear quite often is that of Microsoft Windows offering a “common UI”. That is, one toolkit or framework that is used by all applications, thus giving an experience that is well-integrated and shared. But anyone who has used Windows recently should know that this is clearly not the case.
Last night at the pub, a friend and colleague of mine was telling me of a recent experience he had at a company he was doing some IT work for. I think the lesson learned is a very important one, and thus I wish to share it. But first I’ll describe the situation he encountered.
Ricardo Herrmann just left an excellent comment to an article I had written about the general inadequacy of JavaScript-based Web applications. In his comment, he points out the Brickslayer game. It’s essentially a JavaScript-based Breakout clone. And like Ricardo pointed out, Breakout ran quite well on an Atari 2600. Keep in mind that the Atari 2600 is, well, rather under-powered compared to typical desktop computers today.
I read an article today about using Internet Explorer 7 on Linux. I haven’t tried it yet, but it seems to use WINE in order to actually run the web browser.
I can see how this would be very useful for many web developers. It would allow them to develop their sites on Linux, test with Firefox, Seamonkey, Opera, and other browsers that run natively on Linux. Then they could immediately test with IE7 from the same computer, all without having to reboot into Windows.